Looking beyond the blast percentage threshold in MDS and AML1
Fixed blast cutoffs are suboptimal in distinguishing MDS from AML1
- Clinical classifications systems continue to evolve to de-emphasize morphologic features and fixed blast cutoffs in categorizing MDS and AML2
- Updated 2022 WHO and ICC guidelines focus heavily on molecular and genetic features when characterizing MDS and AML2
ICC, International Consensus Classification; WHO, World Health Organization.
Updated classifications redefined the blast count cutoff in the absence of genetic abnormalities3,4
Patients classified as MDS-IB2 or MDS/AML may have poorer outcomes5-9
- Approximately 1 in 5 MDS patients classify as MDS/AML and may have poorer overall survival outcomes and a greater possibility of progressing to AML5-9
aThe WHO 2022 guidance for MDS-IB2 includes 5% to 19% blasts in the peripheral blood or Auer rods.3
ICC, International Consensus Classification; MDS-EB2, MDS with excess blasts 2; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RAEB-T, RAEB in transformation; WHO, World Health Organization.
Certain genetic abnormalities determine a diagnosis of AML3,4
Updated classifications redefined the diagnosis of AML in the presence of genetic abnormalities3,4
- The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recognizes that patients with certain genetic abnormalities are considered to have AML even if the marrow blast count is less than 20%10,d
- IDH1 mutations frequently co-occur in up to 60% of patients with NPM1 mutations11
- Conduct molecular testing to determine if your patients have an AML-defining genetic abnormality or an IDH1 mutation3,12
Consider using TIBSOVO + AZA for patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1 AML12
Learn morebRUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion, CBFB::MYH11 fusion, DEK::NUP214 fusion, RBM15::MRTFA fusion, BCR::ABL1 fusion, KMT2A rearrangement, MECOM rearrangement, NUP98 rearrangement, NPM1 mutation, CEBPA mutation, myelodysplasia-related genetic abnormalities, and other defined genetic alterations.3
ct(8;21) (q22;q22.1)/RUNX1::RUNX1T1), inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/CBFB::MYH11, t(6;9)(p22.3;q34.1)/DEK::NUP214, t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3)/MLLT3::KMT2A, other KMT2A rearrangements, inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)/GATA2; MECOM(EVI1), other MECOM rearrangements, other rare recurring translocations, mutated NPM1, and in-frame bZIP CEBPA mutations.4
dt(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/RUNX1::RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16) (p13.1;q22)/CBFB::MYH11, t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3)/MLLT3::KMT2A, other KMT2A rearrangements, t(6;9)(p22.3;q34.1)/DEK::NUP214, inv(3)(q21.3q26.2), t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2)/GATA2; MECOM(EVI1), other MECOM rearrangements, mutated NPM1, in-frame bZIP CEBPA mutations (ICC only), RBM15::MRTFA fusion (WHO only), NUP98 rearrangement (WHO only).10
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ICC, International Consensus Classification; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®); WHO, World Health Organization.